<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The difference between IT specification and business requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/10/25/the-difference-between-it-specification-and-business-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/10/25/the-difference-between-it-specification-and-business-requirements/</link>
	<description>Business Led Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alastair Bathgate</title>
		<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/10/25/the-difference-between-it-specification-and-business-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair Bathgate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workforceinabox.com/2007/10/25/the-difference-between-it-specification-and-business-requirements/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Hi Francis
I detect that things are moving in the right direction here in the UK but there are always pockets of people who yearn for the old days.  Maybe it&#039;s a generational thing because new people entering the profession are innocently oblivious to the &quot;old days&quot; and are much more proactive and business focussed in my experience.  I don&#039;t mean that it&#039;s an &quot;age&quot; thing, perhaps it&#039;s a &quot;how long have I been in IT?&quot; thing.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Francis<br />
I detect that things are moving in the right direction here in the UK but there are always pockets of people who yearn for the old days.  Maybe it&#8217;s a generational thing because new people entering the profession are innocently oblivious to the &#8220;old days&#8221; and are much more proactive and business focussed in my experience.  I don&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s an &#8220;age&#8221; thing, perhaps it&#8217;s a &#8220;how long have I been in IT?&#8221; thing&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Carden</title>
		<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/10/25/the-difference-between-it-specification-and-business-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Carden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workforceinabox.com/2007/10/25/the-difference-between-it-specification-and-business-requirements/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I guess, if this wasn&#039;t serious, it&#039;d be funny. The truth is, yet again, it shows business and IT are often not aligned and &quot;agile&quot; integration tools are still used tactically and not strategically.

I grew up in the &quot;4GL&quot; world where &quot;users&quot; learnt that they could have new things quickly (with quality) without waiting. They were so used to the mainframe &quot;2 year wait&quot; for enhancements, this was a real blessing. Seems we have gone backwards because IT should have been &quot;listening&quot; to it&#039;s users here and know they could respond quickly. Have users really given up and just &quot;accept&quot; a &quot;as specificed&quot; response from IT. Have we gone this far backwards or do you think a one-off here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess, if this wasn&#8217;t serious, it&#8217;d be funny. The truth is, yet again, it shows business and IT are often not aligned and &#8220;agile&#8221; integration tools are still used tactically and not strategically.</p>
<p>I grew up in the &#8220;4GL&#8221; world where &#8220;users&#8221; learnt that they could have new things quickly (with quality) without waiting. They were so used to the mainframe &#8220;2 year wait&#8221; for enhancements, this was a real blessing. Seems we have gone backwards because IT should have been &#8220;listening&#8221; to it&#8217;s users here and know they could respond quickly. Have users really given up and just &#8220;accept&#8221; a &#8220;as specificed&#8221; response from IT. Have we gone this far backwards or do you think a one-off here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
