<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshoring Software Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/04/19/offshoring-software-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/04/19/offshoring-software-development/</link>
	<description>Business Led Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Offshoring, The Thesis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Outsourcing prejudice</title>
		<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/04/19/offshoring-software-development/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Offshoring, The Thesis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Outsourcing prejudice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workforceinabox.com/?p=30#comment-249</guid>
		<description>[...] from pursuing what is best in a competitive environment. There are risks with everything (such as emerging hidden costs) but luckily, when a business is profitable, often measures to avoid these risks are discovered [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from pursuing what is best in a competitive environment. There are risks with everything (such as emerging hidden costs) but luckily, when a business is profitable, often measures to avoid these risks are discovered [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saran</title>
		<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/04/19/offshoring-software-development/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Saran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 17:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workforceinabox.com/?p=30#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I cant agree on this post, there are businesses currently successfully executing off shore development, I have a very good experience where a company I use to work before, was about to close at one point, no cash flow, customers pressurising for the project delivery which was signed up, at this point with the less cash flow, moved the project off shore and it was successfully completed and delivered on time with the lesser cost... the companies clever move is 2 local guys are sent back to India to manage... it worked out... can anybody contradict????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant agree on this post, there are businesses currently successfully executing off shore development, I have a very good experience where a company I use to work before, was about to close at one point, no cash flow, customers pressurising for the project delivery which was signed up, at this point with the less cash flow, moved the project off shore and it was successfully completed and delivered on time with the lesser cost&#8230; the companies clever move is 2 local guys are sent back to India to manage&#8230; it worked out&#8230; can anybody contradict????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arik Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/04/19/offshoring-software-development/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Arik Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workforceinabox.com/?p=30#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Great post! I agree with most of the things you&#039;ve said. However, scaling back to a smaller team does mean better quality but doesn&#039;t necessarily always mean a higher quanity. In order to get that quanity you must in the same sense scale up the requirements as far what is required of each team member. But I assume this is just standard anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! I agree with most of the things you&#8217;ve said. However, scaling back to a smaller team does mean better quality but doesn&#8217;t necessarily always mean a higher quanity. In order to get that quanity you must in the same sense scale up the requirements as far what is required of each team member. But I assume this is just standard anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorkForceInABox.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are Offshoring and Outsourcing Different?</title>
		<link>http://www.agilitysoftware.com/2007/04/19/offshoring-software-development/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>WorkForceInABox.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are Offshoring and Outsourcing Different?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workforceinabox.com/?p=30#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] outsourcing is bad, then where does that leave off-shoring?  I have argued previously that off-shoring software development is not good and let me amplify [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] outsourcing is bad, then where does that leave off-shoring?  I have argued previously that off-shoring software development is not good and let me amplify [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
